Phil,
Since when have "known laws of physics" been infallible? Come on;
don't be so narrow-minded. You must allow for new understandings or you will
ever be caught in a rut of past knowledge.
At least be open to the possibility that there are new rules to be discovered
based on new observations that have been/will be scientifically proven with
rigor -- which will be possible with real technologies.
When I refer to "free energy" in my vernacular, it means that we do
not have to pay for the energy. The devices that tap the energy are not free,
and energy is not being created ex-nehilo, but is merely being tranferred from
one form to another.
Radio waves are not seen, but are very real, and are "in the air around
us," so why not energy as well -- free for the taking if we can but harness
it.
That is what I'm after -- such new solutions -- and that is where I draw
attention in my reporting.
I am willing to cover claims that have not yet been proven, citing them as such,
to alert people on the bleeding edge of science to explore the possibilities and
weed out the real, from the bogus, from the scam.
In so doing, we continue to get closer to the truth, and closer to solutions
that will make a tremendous difference for our planet in jeapardy because we've
shirked these possibilities for too long.
In my mind, the only difference between Zero Point Energy and wind energy, for
example, is that ZPE is not yet fully understood and harnessed, and hence not
yet in the mainstream. Both are free energy.
It takes a "remnant" type of personality to be willing to pursue those
answers that lie outside the codified, "accredited" answers that only
so many years or decades or centuries ago were anathema. A person must be
willing to risk reputation for the sake of truth.
Do you really want to be known in history as one of the
"establishment" who balked at the new possibilities and fought them at
every turn? That is your position now. I urge you to be more open minded.
Yes, pursue scientific rigor with the new science, but don't discard new science
just because it has not yet been fully proven.
Move from the skeptic camp to the pioneer camp. It is so much more rewarding,
and your grandchildren will be much more proud of you, than ashamed if you are
merely one who fought every new thing, just because it did not conform to the
status quo.
What will be your mark in the history books? Nothing, if you are merely a
yes-man to the establishment which always balks at new things. That is the
nature of man. The average man waits for something to make it into the
mainstream before embracing it.
Meanwhile, thanks to the pioneers of history who are willing to venture forth
for new possibilities, blazing a trail for generations to follow.
Sterling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Karn" <yahoo56 {at}
ka9q {dot} net>
To: "Sterling D. Allan"
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: [free_energy] RED
FLAGS: GMCC Fuelless Motor
Sterling D. Allan wrote:
> I've seen enough to know that nature gives us some things free, just ours
> for the taking.
>
> Solar, wind, geothermal, are three obvious examples.
And those three are not only in full accord with the known laws of
physics, they actually known to work -- unlike "free energy" as the
term
is usually used here. The problem is not in the science, it's finding
economical ways to exploit them.
So why don't you focus your reporting on developments in these three
areas instead of wasting your time on scamsters hawking permanent magnet
motors and other illusions?
> Where is your imagination?
I have plenty of imagination. I just don't let it get in the way of
observing nature when I'm trying to understand how nature actually
works. Wishful thinking rarely works.
Phil
See also
Feed