|
| |
Ion Source Beam Projector Project Report
June 26, 2004
Sourcing the proper quadrupole magnets has proven to
be more difficult than it used to be, delaying the ability to replicate and
test the original prototype.
From: "axmesumpin"
<JDEnterprizes@mailblocks.c*>
To: <pes_isbp@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 4:25 AM
Subject: [pes_isbp] A bit long but, some things I need to say about all
of this:
Hi Group,
I thought I'd give the magnets that I reversed the poles on a try today but
didn't have all the same materials as before. I substituted the copper plated
stainless steel sheet metal with a piece of galvanized sheet metal cut from a
piece of duct work, it wasn't quite long enough so I could only use six
rectangular magnets. The transformed ring magnets were pretty weak and the poles
were not well defined either but I figured why not give it a shot right? Waste
of time!
I know that I've told everyone to use only the specified materials because I
didn't want others to have to waste time trying all sorts of ways to achieve the
same results as my first device. I didn't really expect the kinds of problems
everyone is having even finding the specified materials until I started looking
for them myself and hadn't expected things to get so crazy.
This all seems to have begun when Sterling had seen the instructions that I had
posted and wanted to make them available to a large number of people and so I
told him to go ahead. I just want you all to know that I am trying to find all
of the original materials and put the thing together now just to reclaim my
honor. Sterling had said that he wanted to open source the technology and
develop it and so I was under the impression that it was he who wanted to open
source this technology. Well, look at me now eh? lol. I had not intended in
getting back into all the free energy issues because I had already gone that
route for many years a long time ago and had learned how things are.
Whether or not people believe that my device worked, there are many other
devices which use the same type of technology and already have patents.
Technologies such as 3D Lithography, MRI units, Ion etching, Nanotechnologies,
not to mention Cyclotrons, Klyotrons, etc.., which all use this kind of
technology to do these things. There are devices which use only permanent
magnets to produce a high energy magnetic beam.
Someone suggested the other day that we all pitch in to pay for the info on the
"Minimono" device which is one of these permanent magnet projection
devices which has recently been patented. I had told that person that it was up
to him since I basically am close to living in the street again and do not have
any finances whatsoever to contribute.
The reasons that I am telling you all these things is because I want you to be
aware that this device which I have described and given instructions on is by no
means the ultimate beam projection device and in fact, it was an accident that I
had assembled these particular materials the way I had, and then also noticed
the projection on the television screen. I had not even thought about the
possibilities of such technologies until years later when it began to hit me.
Unfortunately this was after I had given those quadrupole magnets to the son of
my second ex-wife. It wasn't really even until I began to research into a lot of
things including atmospheric energy, particle accelerators and the like, which
made me realize what I had given away.
I have since talked with many scientists including physicists who have confirmed
my analogy that such a device would likely be able to function basically like an
energy vacuum cleaner which would draw charged particles towards the device in
large quantities. All that would then be required would be to collect the energy
and convert it to AC. The real possibility of high energy discharges from the
atmosphere were also likely and I was warned that this could be dangerous.
I have known about this for many years now and I thought that others should be
aware of this kind of technology especially since science rarely excepts the
concepts of free energy theories and/or devices, and this seems to be one that
they cannot reject since it complies with what they already know. I remembered
the work that Tesla did and figured that this type of device could greatly
increase the energy collected from the atmosphere since it could conceivably be
used to create a direct conduit to the ionosphere if so desired. Magnetic lenses
could also be used to collect more ambient energy over a wider area if a direct
link/conduit were undesirable.
This is all that I wanted to get across and is the only reason that I wanted to
point out this type of thing to those who are interested in free energy issues.
I had made a decision to release info on the internet because of the requests of
certain people and so that others could develop something out of it if they
wanted. What I was lead to believe was, that others wanted to do this and that
was fine with me. What I did not know, was that I would be the only one to be
doing anything besides those of you in this forum who are interested.
I just want you all to know that I am not some big expert in nuclear physics and
that my device is by no means what would be used to tap into the energy of the
atmosphere. A much larger and more powerful unit would need to be developed of
which I do NOT have the finances to support. I do believe that I understand the
processes of such devices and believe that I could develop such a device but I
am not the best person nor the most qualified to head up such a project.
I just don't want to mislead anyone and I have had enough of accusations from
people throughout the last 30+ years to last me several lifetimes. The main
reason for disclosing this information to people was to contribute what I
believed might be useful information which would offer a sure way to provide
energy to the world. I apologize to all of you who may feel that you have been
mislead in any way by reading anything that I have posted or have allowed to be
posted, and I assure you that this has never been my intent at all. I hope that
this will help to clear up any confusion about all of this and set things
straight so that you will not focus on me and/or mistakes that I may make from
time to time but, that you will have learned that these beam technologies are
very real and that the possibility of drawing large amounts of energy from the
vast inexhaustible resources of the atmosphere and/or space are indeed possible.
Also, I honestly believe that there are many other technologies which could be
developed from such devices and could be nearly as valuable. This is another
reason that I picked this particular type of technology to bring up.
There are some great people in this forum and I am thankful for being able to
talk with you all. I am not giving up and fully intend to vindicate myself in
all this. Hopefully things will begin to go right and all things will be for the
better through all of this.
No matter what your views or opinions of me are, I do thank everyone of you for
being concerned about our energy issues these days. You are all honorable people
in my eyes. I have lived long enough to see that most people these days just
don't care about anything other than their own little world and what they can
get and that makes you all very special people. If everyone else would just get
involved in these kinds of issues, our world would be a lot better place to
live.
I hope that I have not made anyone angry with me now, but I just felt that I had
to clarify these things and get this off my chest. Free energy is there for the
taking! It is not a matter of if we have the technology!
The reasons that we do not see free energy being available are because of
political issues which are fueled by greed and the lust for another kind of
power that we DO NOT need that is what is and has long been obstructing progress
in this area.
God bless you all,
Jim
See also
Page posted by SDA
June 26, 2004
Last updated June 26, 2004
| |
|
