You are here: PureEnergySystems.com > Open Sourcing > Ion Source Beam Projector > Theory > Explaining Process Within Device

Attempting to Explain Processes Within the ISBP Device

Ion Source Beam Projector demonstrates that movement of magnetic fields exceeds the speed of light, according to Honeywell study.

From: "axmesumpin" <JDEnterprizes@mailblocks.c*>
To: <pes_isbp@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: [pes_isbp] Attempting to Explain Processes Within the ISBP Device:

I will attempt to give my opinion of what I believe to be happening within the ISBP device to cause the projection of the magnetic field in the direction of a straight line beam.

This is not by any means an argument as to whether my hypothesis is right or wrong but is only my opinion which I have concluded thus far from my observations concerning the operation of this device. You may decide for yourselves whether or not my observations seem logical to you at this point and I would like to again stress that these comments are given only from my observations and are not to be written in stone. I am absolutely positive that there will be other observations and opinions by my critics.

Also, I would like to add that being that this does indeed seem to be a new and unique design for this type of technology, all opinions are actually encouraged and welcome as this will help to sort through all reasonable explanations for the processes which are contributing to the functions of this device.

To start with, I have observed that the intensity of the magnetic field projection seems to vary according to both the strength of the opposing magnets used, and/or the distance between the magnets within the total arrangement. To use an analogy, I would compare this magnetic flux/field stress to squeezing a water bottle that has a small hole in the cap. The force and distance of the projection of water is determined by how much pressure/force is exerted upon the container of water. This seems like a fair analogy being that many people still prefer to use a liquid or aether analogy to understand electric and magnetic phenomena.

There is also another possible aspect of the ISBP device which I believe could be contributing to the projection of the magnetic field of which I have come to conclude from little known studies that were undertaken by the Honeywell corporation back in the early to mid 1980's. The studies were conducted in order to find out the speed at which a magnetic field travels. From my talks with a friend who was one of the engineers at Honeywell, I learned that they had discovered that certain spectrum's within a magnetic field actually appear to travel faster than the speed of light. I want to state that these were confidential studies and so this information may not be easy to find on the Internet if it has been posted at all, in case you are wondering.

I believe that because of the arrangement of the specific materials described in the ISBP instructions, that this second aspect of the ISBP device can be similarly compared to the way a laser beam is produced within a gas laser. In other words, the flux field within and around the ISBP device could be stressed to such a point that it is accelerated to a critical point to where it reaches escape velocity from the ports or center holes of the quadrupoles.

Remember, this is only a theory and is based upon what I have learned from my friend from Honeywell, however if this is indeed the case, It would explain certain phenomena related to intense magnetic fields such as the bending of light, invisibility, time displacement, etc. .

Although, because this is only conjecture, I will not go into further details about other theories which I have concerning this at this time as I am sure that I will hear enough about this already and all arguments would simply be a waste of time being that there is currently no way of proving this one way or another.

One more explanation or analogy could be to compare an ion particle to a small object passing by a large planet whereby the gravitational and magnetic fields of the planet provide a slingshot effect upon the object and causes an acceleration of the object as it passes by. NASA has used this principal for many space crafts to save on fuel. I don't know if these are the best ways to describe what seems to me to be happening to produce the effects that I have observed but, it is what works for me.

Everyone will most likely draw their own conclusions and this will help in the long run to find experimental data which can be used to confirm the true facts of the matter. The newly revised interest in magnetic and electromagnetic phenomena are exciting to me and I believe that there is now enough new proof in this area to constitute a revision of physics as we were taught to believe until recently. I also believe that the knowledge that will be gained from what we are learning today will provide for the biggest leaps ever seen in science and technology in the very near future.

James D. Fauble

* * * *

Theory: Possible AC Application

From: Howard Rogers <cyclesandgardens@yahoo.c*>
To: pes_isbp@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [pes_isbp] Attempting to Explain Processes Within the ISBP
Device:

Assuming that this device can indeed project a magnetic beam for say 1 kilometer, it could collect a lot if ions, hence a lot of power.  At this distance it would not short out the ionosphere, and on a clear day would not provide an ion trail for catastrophic discharge. What we need to do next (as I see it) is to intercept the proton stream BEFORE it reaches the ground, and charge a large capacitor bank (a la Van de Graf but affordable) and run a harmonic circuit to convert this charge to AC and transform it into something that does not have hundreds of thousands of volts and few amps, but hundreds of volts and lots of amps.  That way we would have some power we could make use of.

Open for criticism and refinement.

* * * *

I've Only Tested it up to 50 Feet

* * * *

If quadrupole is acting as a lens

All this stuff I am saying is speculation based on my understanding of things.  At this stage, I am 'blue skying', that is imagining what to do, and how and why to control the results to get something out of it.

I guess I am still getting up to speed.  I just pulled the 1 km number out of my head.  Even 50 feet would have a large voltage and need something like I described.  The number of ions the beam could collect (the way I see it) would depend on the surface area of the beam, like the amount of current a wire can carry, the height determining the voltage.  It also seems to me that the current carrying capacity of the beam would be limited by field strength, that is the more current, the more opposition to the beam, and the more disruption of the beam would occur due to the magnetic field inherent in the current.

On the issue of current and voltage control.  You state that distance between the array and the quadrupole also determines beam parameters.  This makes sense if the quadrupole is acting as a lens.  It also offers a way of controlling rate of ion capture.  Through internal electronic feedback, again like a camera lens, a person might be able to dynamically adjust the beam and maintain energy performance and limit catastrophic discharge, especially during thunderstorms.

It would be nice to get a beam that was taller than trees, as the field lines of electrostatic potential are compressed upwards by the trees in the vicinity, and this would make the beam out-compete the trees in compressing the lines.  In valleys, the lines are pulled apart by the valley walls, so in areas like that, the taller the better to collect lots of "juice".

See also

• Theory > How the Ion Source Beam Projector Might be Used for Free Energy Applications - James Fauble says the ISBP provides a means by which to tap into the ocean of energy around us without the need for gigantic antennas.
• Theories About ISBP
• Ion Source Beam Projector Open Sourcing Project -- main index

Page posted by Sterling D. Allan June 19, 2004
Last updated June 20, 2004

www.PureEnergySystems.com
Copyright © 2003, 2004