|
|
Gear VariationsVariationsBelt Instead of GearsDec. 30, 2003 Dec. 22, 2003 The following link was used to calculate how much the distance needs to be
adjusted between attracting and repelling. The belt is a so-called timing belt. With teeth on both sides, no slip possible.
Doug says: "I love the Belt drive this kind of belt can hand the forces with ease. I would say use 1/2 " wide belt. It will help with the Gearing problem. This can be big step to mass unit." Sourcing: (Ken Rauen) A wide selection of belts is available from McMaster-Carr. They sell to individuals and their service is excellent. Reach them online at www.mcmaster.com, as I recall. Another source (a better one, actually) for unusual mechanical products is Small Parts, Inc. Chain SprocketOn Dec. 31, 2003, Mark Wiseman suggested: "A small chain-sprocket is another idea." DiscussionMy
New Year’s thoughts related to the friction discussion thread: Considering
the three mentioned methods of transferring mechanical energy, namely: 1.
Tooth
belt 2.
Chain-sprocket 3.
Gears For
all methods, coefficients of friction will likely change with different torque
loads. Interrelated
effects that contribute to mechanical energy transfer, applicable to all three
methods, include:
Atmospheric gas, aerodynamic drag
Reduce by enclosing system in a vacuum or rarified gas.
Design aerodynamic pulleys/gears.
Borrow ideas from the bicycle industry which makes high-end racing
wheels.
Mechanical drag at moving contact surfaces
Reduce by using a lubricant and using highly polished contact surfaces,
and/or using self-lubricating materials. If
materials are chosen for self-lubricating qualities, be sure hardness is not
compromised, which would lead to deformation.
Deformation of material at transfer interface (contact area),
plasticity (all materials deform)
Reduce by using hard materials, such as hardened steel or ceramic
Reduce by using less force concentration over load bearing transfer
area (psi). This
suggests larger diameter pulley/gears and/or thicker sprocket/gear teeth (or
grooved V-belt). Thicker
sprocket/gears would lead to higher contact surface area which would increase
friction, while
larger diameter would lead to higher angular velocity and distance over which
friction would act.
Deformation would result in coefficients of friction changes between
acceleration/deceleration and constant velocity due to load change.
Axel/shaft bearing and adverse influence of directional forces on shaft
bearing resistance
Suggests gears would be most efficient, since gears need zero belt
tension.
Centrifugal forces on any belt will cause tension of the belt and a
resulting side force on the pulley shaft.
Magnetic or gas bearing, though expensive, would give the best results.
Electrostatic forces generated from triboelectric
and/or Faraday effect may contribute to observed
friction. It
would be a surprise if this somehow played a role in the success of the
subject device. Different
materials, atmospheres, physical positioning of magnets, allowable tolerance
in uniformity of fields, and geometry need to be explored, once we replicate
this thing. --signed,
The self-made Mechanical Engineer. (-:
Page posted by Sterling
D. Allan, Dec. 22, 2003 |
|
|
www.PureEnergySystems.com |