Bowman Magnet Motor Open Sourcing Project

Status: Project commenced Dec. 2003 with claim to a working device, which later, after three months, ended up running down due to demagnetization.  No replications were accomplished though several were attempted.

(PES Home)

- BMM Home -

Latest

Discussion
pes_bmm
callowaymotorsgroup

Supplemental
- Sourcing
- Calculator
- Patents
- Variations
- Follow-up
- Gauss Meter
   Make for $6.00

- Images
 o Simulation
 o Photos
 o AutoCAD
 o Video

Replications
- Worked
- Built
- In Progress
- Data

FAQ

Related Sites

Contact

Energy > Inexhaustible > Magnetic Motors > Bowman > Open Sourcing > Replications > In Progress > Dax Hamilton

Ken Hagemann's Replication of the Bowman Magnetic Motor

Has rendered in AutoCAD, assembly is complete, with all components.  Now ready to tune.  Has turned it over to Hugh Campbell.

Unit-KH/HC-2004-BLT

First Photos

Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:33 AM
Subject: GTcontact

Sterling,
 
I have attached two pictures that were taken just before installing the magnets.


click for full-resolution version

* * * *


click for full-resolution version

I do not have a picture with magnets installed.  I am sure Hugh will get some out for posting after this weekend.  As you know, he removed the magnets and sorted them for the optimum match-up within the assembly.  Trust me, Unit-KH-1-2004-BLT is in good hands with Hugh.  He is doing the most important part of the job right now.  I want this unit to be referred to as Unit-KH/HC-2004-BLT.

 
Thanks,
 
Ken Hegemann

Magnets Need to be Secured Better; Got Movement Doing Something Different

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PES_BMM/message/494

From: hugh Campbell
To: PES_BMM@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: No Re: [PES_BMM] Re: Going public, already?

Sterling,

I had problems with the magnet mounting glue. The glue was not a permanent type and the magnets started to shift. They would hit each other during rotation. After gaping the magnets about 3 time, I figured out what was happening. I removed all the magnets and then took readings on them. They range from 4.63 to 5.01 kgauss. I plan to match the magnets within 10-20 gauss of each other and then remount them with Devcon 5 minute epoxy. Ken had two sets of magnets and I have only done the readings on the set he had mounted and which I de-mounted. I will take readings on the rest of the magnets tonight and then mount the magnets on a setup utilizing a granite slab to ensure accurate "Z" mounting. This will be done on Friday. That puts me back to where I started except that I don't think I will have any more problems with the magnets shifting. I hope to have some good news next week.

I am also not too sure about the timing sequence of the magnets. I tried just holding a magnet and rotating it manually in a circle (with both small rotors removed and actuator in place) and was able to get the motor to sustain operation. When I checked the location of the magnet I was holding to the location of the magnets on the main wheel, it intersected exactly between the magnets and never overlapped the mounted magnets. I had tried for two days to get the motor operating before the glue had started to fail without any success. Now with just a simple test, I am questioning why it was so easy to get it operating manually with a crossover between the rotor magnets vs. the overlap configuration that seems to be very difficult to align. I will look into both methods and report my results back to the group.

Hugh

See also http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PES_BMM/message/496

* * * *

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PES_BMM/message/497 

Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: [PES_BMM] Campbell reports movement using different config? (Unit K.H-1-2004-BLT)

Sterling,

I will try to send some photos this weekend after I remount the magnets. It should not take too much to repeat what I did.  I will ask Ken to send you photos. He took a lot and has them in various stages of construction and complete with magnets. As far as a quick further explanation; My hand was essentially acting as one of the small rotors. The only difference is that the magnet crossover or timing would be 90 degrees out of phase from what I understood. The small rotor magnets would cross over the main rotor exactly between the main rotor magnets. While holding the magnet, I could feel the repelling force sweep the main rotor magnets forward causing the main rotor to turn. It could be that this also works but maybe creates less torque vs. forcing the rotor magnet over main rotor magnet. I am just speculating and will have a better idea of what is happening next week. I just wanted to pass this along as I feel that I had spent a considerable amount of time with the motor adjusting the actuator,

Hugh


Completed and Balanced

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:15 AM
Subject: Unit-KH-1-2004-BLT

My replication is complete and balanced.  As my business is expanding rapidly, I have no time to work on the motor.  I am very excited about the possibilities of the motor working and want that to happen very soon.  I have therefore passed my replication on to the very capable Hugh Campbell.  If this theory works, Hugh has the expertise to see it through and more importantly, he will document every procedure and report to the group accordingly.  With all confidence, I pass the baton to Hugh and I will be eagerly watching cheering from the sidelines.
 
Ken Hegemann

Hugh Campbell will be Fine Tuning

Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: [PES_BMM] Unit -KH-1-2004-BLT

Doug,
      Ken does not have the time to finish adjusting the motor so he is going to hand it off to me next week. I will be using the gauss meter mounted on an x and y micrometer stage to profile the magnetic fields and see if I can figure out what the actuator is doing when it finally starts to work. Hopefully it will provide the clues and lead to an easier way to do the final adjustments. With some luck, I might have it running by the end of next week. I will make my findings available as soon as I can including video. I have to say Ken has done an outstanding job on his unit. I have personally seen it and it has been fabricated with high precision and runs tight and smooth. I feel that if any unit is going to work based on the specifications, this is the unit. Hopefully, I will have some good news by the end of next week.
Hugh
[Hugh Campbell]

Magnetic Balance Achieved

From: Douglas
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 1:54 PM
Subject: [PES_BMM] Unit -KH-1-2004-BLT

Hugh,
  
Ken said to me in a short phone call, That his Unit is magnetically balanced.
   This is the big step towards a working unit. This shows that we are doing it right on, and the rotor design is OK. His unit has 4.5 shaft spacings, and zero back lash on the gear set. Next he has not had, but 15 min to work with it. With more time he should have it. This is not an exact reproduction of Unit 0, but it is an Off the shelf design.
   This is the plan that people can get the parts and make unit.  So this design is more important than Unit 0 in that regard.
Regards
Douglas

Assembled Unit; Having Trouble Getting it to Work

Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 4:29 PM
Subject: RE: [PES_BMM] Re: Bowman patent?

Douglas,
      Ken has an assembled unit and is having trouble getting it to work.
I am doing what I can to help him out. Do you have a detailed explanation with some of the intuitive tips necessary to get this motor to work? It seemed to me that it took you several hours of playing around to get it going. It seems this is an area that could still be a stumbling block for most people.
Hugh

Tri-Metric View

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 4:43 PM
Subject: [PES_BMM] Detail

Group,  Here is a close-up view of the actuator magnet holder as designed for easy adjustment.

 
Ken Hegemann
 
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [PES_BMM] Picture and Diagrams of our builds

Here is a tri-metric view of my replication of the Bowman motor.


click for enlargement

Please note that the only change I have made since posting the AutoCad drawings is that the large center rotor is now nearest to the mounting plate instead of the two smaller rotors being nearest to the mounting plate. This change has absolutely no effect on the functionality of the motor because at the same time, I have reversed polarity of all of the magnets. So this rendition is magnetically identical to the Bowman motor.  This change allows for much easier mounting of the actuator magnet and provides more latitude in adjusting the position of the actuator magnet. I created this drawing using the 3-D software Solid Works 2004.  I will post the actual Solid Works files within two weeks.  As far as progress, I will be ready for testing of this replication on Jan 31.

 
Ken Hegemann

Have some Extra Magnets

From: kenh2k@aol.com
To: PES_BMM@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [PES_BMM] Purpose

I have ordered my magnets.  I went with the NEO 32 to the exact size specified (3/8 diameter X 1.750 long, and 3/8 X 1/2 X 1.375 long.  These are custom built magnets and quite expensive.  But remember, it's a prototype!  I have purchased enough for three replications.  The round magnets are $16.50 each and the rectangle magnets were $75.00 each (Due to low quantity)  Anyone who would like to get a set of magnets form me, please let me know.  By the way, my magnets will be delivered January 31.  And the G rating is guaranteed to be nearly identical throughout the batch of 50 round magnets that I have ordered.  Ken Hegemann

Replicating as Close as Possible, Though Missing Details

Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PES_BMM] Purpose

Mark,  I seems that no one really has the exact specifications of unit 0.  I am trying to build a unit that replicates a nearly as possible the THEORY behind this with as many dimensions as we can draw from what has been published.  I am changing the frame simply because my method will prove or disprove the THEORY in exactly the same way as any other frame that hold the THEORY, however I can control tolerances much better with my frame design.  I don't want to wonder if my motor is perhaps not running due to some misfit or misalignment of components. I am following the suggested magnetic perimeters as closely as possible.  Also, if we end up with a number of slightly different replications, that will be good as we will all share our successes and failures.  Good luck with whatever direction you go.   Ken Hegemann

Magnet Vendors

Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: Campbell: [PES_BMM] First AutoCAD rendition of Bowman by Ken Hegemann

Group,  I have three of my magnet vendors also looking into our specks.  Will advise when I get some feedback.  

Shooting from the Hip

Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Campbell: [PES_BMM] First AutoCAD rendition of Bowman by Ken Hegemann

Hugh,
 
I agree that the drawings should be detailed.  However, with all due respect, I feel it is just a bit too early for that.  I would prefer to assemble my rendition first, get a few bugs sorted out, modify the drawings accordingly, then present detailed drawings to the group.  Hope you understand.  Otherwise we will have renditions of renditions and perhaps too much lost time by some individuals.
 
Ken Hegemann

 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 5:36 AM
Subject: [PES_BMM] (no subject)

From the “For what it’s worth department”….I have been building prototype projects for many years. As an engineer, here is how I approach a theory-based project.  Cutting corners on material costs at this juncture is a mistake.  This particular project requires 90% time and 10% materials. After spending countless hours of trial and error, I don’t want to discover a problem that reverts back to the fact that I tried to save a little money on materials. A prototype is rather expensive.  If the theory proves to work, it’s very easy to reduce material costs the next go-a-round.  Also, I want to be certain that components come together and fit properly.  There are a lot of things to consider along those lines including what type of equipment do I have to work with in building the prototype.  What tolerances can I expect to get with the equipment I am using? In this project, I have decided to take the “die-set” approach to building the framework.  This approach assures perfect alignment of the parallel shafts and I think that is a real big issue in this project. I want those shafts to spin with ease.  I am not suggesting that anyone else use this approach right now, in fact I think you should adhere to the basic drawings that have been presented by others for a unit that apparently works.  If my approach works out, I invite others to follow and I will be happy to provide all specifications and a complete BOM (bill of materials). 

Regardless of how you build your framework, here is some scoop on the gears.  I have selected 24 DP with a ¼ inch face.  The small gears have 72 teeth while the larger gear has 144 teeth.  These are standard gears. I am starting out with “0” backlash just to be safe.  Aluminum is a good material choice.  Ask for a gear quality 10 or better.  24 DP is probably over-kill on the gears.  Going down to as little as 64 DP would likely be OK for this low torque application.  Anyway, for now it really doesn’t make any difference. You will be able to get the gears with a built-in hub with a ½ inch bore.  The gears as mentioned above have  3” and 6” respective pitch diameters. This combination yields (and dictates) a 4-1/2” shaft center distance.  No one has told us what the exact center distance should be and frankly, I don’t think it is a real critical issue when considering the very minor “magnet approach angle” changes that are encountered by changing the center distance.  I am personally happy with the 4-1/2 inch center distance.  Others may want to try something else.  You can change the center distance by selecting a different gear DP and then change the number of teeth.  As long as you have half as many teeth in the small gear, you will be OK. 

As far as the material for the frame, I am using Delrin.  I really don’t think going with a see-thru material is necessary.  The rotors are completely exposed and easy to inspect.  What’s to see under the first mounting plate?  Only the gear train and that is elementary.  Anyway, Delrin is a very tough material and has perfect machine ability qualities and is not very expensive.  You can get it white or black.  I am going black on my replication.

As far as timing on my particular replication…  I drew up all of the parts before leaving yesterday on a two-week trip.  All of the components are being made for me while I am gone.  I will personally assemble the unit upon return so I should have the thing together by January 31.  I will keep you abreast of the progress.  Ken Hegemann

Jan. 7, 2004

From: KenH2K@aol.com
To: sterlingda@greaterthings.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:34 AM
Subject: FreeEnergy.GreaterThings.com Contact

Sterling,
 
[...] Regarding the shape of the rotors, I do have a number of  very specific reasons for the shape which will become evident once the unit is assembled.  I will explain in detail in due course.  I have noted however at the base of the drawing that the rotors can be round.  I will have the unit completed by January 31,  running??, that's another issue.
 
Thanks, 
 
Ken Hegemann

Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PES_BMM] Ken Hegemann page

Eric,  I will have a rendering only of the ACad drawing by Wednesday and the actual ACad files will be available later this month as I will be traveling until Jan 25.
 
Thanks,
 
Ken Hegemann
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: Ken Hegemann joins BMM team

Sterling,
 
I will get the ACad renditions to you by Wednesday PM.  In meetings today and getting ready to travel on Thursday.    
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Bowman 1 of 2

Sterling,
 
I drew the entire device last night on AutoCAD and have ordered the components this AM.  I have made a number of modifications from the sketches I was able to obtain from your website, but final functionality should be the same.  The changes I made will allow for easier adjustments in due course.  I have all of the equipment needed to make this thing right here in my laboratory.  I have developed a high-end power oral care device.  See hydrabrush.com
 
Thanks again,
 
Ken Hegemann

 

See also

Contact

 

Page created by Sterling D. Allan, Jan. 6, 2004
Last updated March 05, 2004
 visits since Jan. 28, 2004

Google


PureEnergySystems.com
Search WWW

www.PureEnergySystems.com
Copyright © 2003, 2004