Ken Hegemann's MXLO Magnetic Motor replicationMXLO Magnet Motor Open Sourcing Project

Summary: This open sourcing project sponsored by Pure Energy Systems, based on a design by MXLO, commenced Mar. 3, 2004 and was active for about a month.  At least 14 (8 verified) replications were built, none of which worked, proving that MXLO plans are neither easy nor complete, contrary to what they insinuate on their site, which now redirects to the U.S. government's renewable energy site. On July 10, a hint about shielding was given that was not contained in the plans.

(PES Home)

- Project Home -
- GreaterThings -

Translate Page

Latest

Forum

Replications
Working (not verified)
- Neweid(?)
Built; not working
- tip_alias
- Joe Friday
- Ken Hegemann
- Chris H.
- Dann McCreary
- Tero Ranta
- Retrorocket59
- Wayne Jones
- Ed Anderson
- more

Data
- Performance Data
- Non-working
- Flux Field Data
- Electrical Output
- Optimization

Supplemental
- Sourcing
- Ramifications

Theory (How)
- Spiral
- Aluminum
- ZPE

Legal
- MXLO Permission
- MXLO & NDA
- Patents

Images
 o Simulation
 o Photos
 o AutoCAD
 o Video (pending)

FAQ
Related Sites
Contact


http://tinyurl.com/2r33f
You are here:
Pure Energy Systems > Open Sourcing > Magnetic Motors > MXLO > Patents

Patents Relevant to MXLO Magnetic Motor

Contents:

See also: Most recent messages as pes_mxlo mentioning "patent"

 

Need for Search

MXLO Cannot Divulge Info About Relevant Patents

To: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: MXLO Conference.

Sterling,

As I have stated from the start of our correspondence, we are not the inventors of this device, so we are limited to what we can disclose, this including patents that may be connected, documented, withheld, or ordered against full disclosure. We have an agreement that we must legally respect in regards to how we offer the device. There is a reason we cannot tell anyone exactly how to operate the unit, but in open sourcing it will be the experimentation of each builder that will lead them to discovery of the unit's functions, and how to augment it's use. In agreeing to openly discuss the device via a phone conference our attorney may insist on the non-disclosure of certain information that we may be required to present to you prior to our conference. Otherwise, we must say for educational purposes only, and limit the conference to what is already disclosed about the device.

Thomas Jean

http://www.mxlo.com
http://www.magnethealer.com

* * * *

From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] More from MXLO

I asked MXLO, [...] Can you tell me the patent number, or name of the person this idea comes from? Something I can go to... You had implied that other agencies or patents may be keeping you from disclosing more info, since you mentioned helping this older inventor to relinquish the patent, why can't you give more information?

   "Sorry. We are bound by legal agreements."

Solving the riddle -- searching for relevant patents

 

As we attempt to solve this riddle of getting this device to work, now that we have built it, one thing we can do is to conduct a patent search on the various components of the MXLO design and theory. Reading between the lines from Thomas' communications, there are some patents that could be very helpful. His NDA prohibits him from telling us what those are, but we are under no such restraints.

We need to tap into all possible resources that may help us to solve the riddle. Group members can all get involved and someone may come up with a patent or two that discloses the device or something similar. As many know, a patent is published as a means of teaching the public about something novel. If there is a patent on this (or a similar device), the text of the patent itself will tell us how to make the device work.

We have access to the same tools that are available to patent attorneys who conduct patent searches. The search is conducted on the Internet at www.uspto.gov. Anyone with reasonably good computer skills can do this. The important thing is to come up with good key words that will send the search in the right direction. You just have to get creative and come up with terms that you think best describe the device. As you go through a search, it will become clear that different key words lead you in different directions and point you toward different patents. Once you locate a patent that is even remotely similar to the device, you look on the title page of that patent and it will have a list of Referenced Patents. By looking up those referenced patents, you are then able to build on your list by checking out the next list of referenced patents etc, etc.

One note, this electronic database only goes back to 1976. To search older patents, a trip to a BIG city library is necessary. There you can conduct a search on microfilm. Once a group member locates a patent of interest, they can post it and other members can use this information to search even further. It would be helpful if members would post some of the key words that produce good search results.

According to the MXLO website, this design has been around for decades, so actually, the likelihood of the key patent being pre-1976 is high. However, post 1976 patents might reference the earlier patent. Obviously, before the advent of the Internet and of the computer, the USPTO had means of searching their database, and those means can still be employed.

One hint that Thomas has given us (last week) is that the name MXLO contains the initials of the inventor, who is now in his 80s. The "O" does not stand for anything. The M is not one of the initials (stands for "magnet"?).

While Thomas cannot outright divulge the answer, he does seem to want us to find it, and has been helpful in leading us in the right direction.

Let the hunt begin.

Ken Hegemann
Sterling Allan


Physical Paper Patent Search Should Also be Done

Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [pes_mxlo] IMPORTANT: solving the riddle -- searching for clues; relevant patents?

Umm... I almost agree.  The online USPTO material is not complete, it is not a substitute for a physical paper search.  I personally worked on these USPTO computer projects.  The online search is a good start, but note many images do not have their text in a searchable form.  Note the class/subclass and do keyword searches.  Learning to do effective searches is a full time job and not trivial.

Secondly, the purpose of a patent is to restrict commerce by granting exclusivity.  Teaching the public about novel ideas is only a secondary by-product from the standpoint of the inventor/attorney. 

[patents do expire ]


Thoughts About Being Open

From: "retrorocket59" <retrorocket59@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 9:36 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: More notes

[...]

My thoughts about being open here... If this concept is already owned by some military or government agency and considering how many patents are out there, that possibility of someone having a leg to stand on in secreting off to get rich on a patent is bad odds.  For example, I think 30 years ago when Raleigh or Norelco invented a shaving cream can that foamed warm cream; the only thing they could patent was the 90-degree crook in the neck of a delivery tube at the bottom of the can.  In contrast, the number of people patenting 'mechanical' rotating arrangements over the last 100 years is in effect - astounding.  And for one to additionally create a novel and provable theory on the generation of energy... like I said, haven't they had these concepts being pulled from the public for over 50 years? 

---RetroRocket59---


Possible Patent Questions of MXLO

From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:38 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: IMPORTANT: solving the riddle -- searching for clues; relevant patents?

Yes, a manual patent search is needed. I know the Austin Texas
engineering library has abstracts on the shelf back to the 1900's or
so...  I cannot get that kind of time though.

I have some thoughts though.  If the patent was taken by the Navy,
it and related patents may have been hidden and there would be
little or no references.

Last, how did the idea come out?  And I guess we could ask MXLO
directly. 
1. Did this older man blow-off the military/government and decide to
give it out under limitations of other patents and agreements he
knows about. 
2. Has some original agreement or this patent expired?
3. Or has someone decided it is time to 'seed' the public and is
letting it go and used MXLO?

What happened or is happening will affect the ability to find any
public references.  If there are other agreements or patents , as
Thomas my know or is just deducing, then maybe later uses or surely
better concepts have been well developed... 
---RetroRocket59---

Clues

Short List

  • Inventor is still alive, associated with MXLO in some way.
  • Inventor is in his 80's
  • Invention took place in the 1930's?
  • MXLO contains the inventor's initials.  O does not stand for anything, and M stands for magnet?  Thus: XL?
  • MXLO is under NDA to not disclose certain related patents.

(Sterling)

Here is what MXLO says on their website:

http://magnethealer.com/faq.html#3

Why don't you patent this device and manufacture it?

Suppression . If you believe there is no such thing then we suggest you apply for a provisional patent on the device yourself.

Click here for a short list of suppressed inventions.

If your provisional patent is accepted by the USPTO  then we will reimburse the filing fee of $80.00 and will purchase licensing rights from you for distribution. Here is the link for a Provisional Patent . Good Luck!


 

Search Tools

European patent office has a much larger selection of online patents

From: "TeroRanta" <tero.ranta@bigfoot.com>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: Patent Database

Regarding patents, I have found out that the European patent office
has a much larger selection of online patents (dating to the
beginning of last century) than the uspto. You can access the
European system here:

http://gb.espacenet.com/

Ps. click the binoculars icon on the left hand side for parametric
search (for some reason you need to perform simple search before you
can access advanced search)

Tero

 

Related Patents

 

Related Patent: Continuous Electrical Generator

From: Larry Rand
To: pes_ee@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [pes_ee] mag motor variant idea



Sterling,

Here is a patent application for a " continuous electrical generator" that uses the "electrically" rotating magnetic field to produce power. --No moving parts. Same concept you are asking about --but generator application

Patent APPLICATION Number: 20020125774
APPLICATION date was September 12 2002


See also

 

Index created by SDA March 7, 2004
Last updated March 14, 2004 04:21:31 PM MST

Google


Web PureEnergySystems

Disclaimer: MXLO is an independent company that has given us permission to post their plans here.  This arrangement should not be construed as an endorsement by them of everything that appears here.

www.PureEnergySystems.com
Copyright © 2003, 2004