Ken Hegemann's MXLO Magnetic Motor replicationMXLO Magnet Motor Open Sourcing Project

Summary: This open sourcing project sponsored by Pure Energy Systems, based on a design by MXLO, commenced Mar. 3, 2004 and was active for about a month.  At least 14 (8 verified) replications were built, none of which worked, proving that MXLO plans are neither easy nor complete, contrary to what they insinuate on their site, which now redirects to the U.S. government's renewable energy site. On July 10, a hint about shielding was given that was not contained in the plans.

(PES Home)

- Project Home -
- GreaterThings -

Translate Page

Latest

Forum

Replications
Working (not verified)
- Neweid(?)
Built; not working
- tip_alias
- Joe Friday
- Ken Hegemann
- Chris H.
- Dann McCreary
- Tero Ranta
- Retrorocket59
- Wayne Jones
- Ed Anderson
- more

Data
- Performance Data
- Non-working
- Flux Field Data
- Electrical Output
- Optimization

Supplemental
- Sourcing
- Ramifications

Theory (How)
- Spiral
- Aluminum
- ZPE

Legal
- MXLO Permission
- MXLO & NDA
- Patents

Images
 o Simulation
 o Photos
 o AutoCAD
 o Video (pending)

FAQ
Related Sites
Contact


http://tinyurl.com/3gz2v
You are here:
Pure Energy Systems > Open Sourcing > Magnetic Motors > MXLO > Plans > Assembly > MXLO Withdraws Its Tech Support

MXLO Withdraws Its Tech Support

From: Sterling D. Allan
To: PES MXLO project egroup
Cc: Pure Energy Systems Admin egroup
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Message from Thomas Mar. 15 -- no more support for pes_mxlo individuals


This message came in from Thomas on Monday, and is in large measure the "last straw" that turned my support of him to one of critic, spurring the most recent series of posts from me.
 
Put yourself in my shoes.  You have scores of people working on a replication of a device based on plans that you have posted on your site as being "adequate," according to their source, to produce a working unit; then you learn from the source of the plans that they are not adequate, and that the reason they are not adequate is because they are bound by an NDA (which their site makes not so much as a hint of, but portrays instead that the plans are adequate and that MXLO will help those doing replications from the plans to produce a working unit).
 
My first obligation is to those who are putting forth time and money in doing replications, to inform them of this crucial piece of information.  That is what I did.
 
Here is Thomas' response to that.  Not only does he cut me off, but he makes the statement that he will no longer even communicate with those associated with pes_mxlo, even though there are many paying customers among them.
 
This, in my opinion, is another major breach of integrity, and shows a black side to these people and their claims.
 
Note the reasonable message I wrote to Thomas that evoked this response.
 
Sterling
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: the v word

Sterling,

Due to the open discussion of the non-disclosure agreement within your group,
we have been advised to state for educational purposes only.
This is stated on our website as a prior agreement to purchase.
We have also been advised to discontinue all dialogues that relate to your
specific group.


Thomas Jean

http://www.mxlo.com
http://www.magnethealer.com





Quoting "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com>:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> I would like to see if I can't talk you into going ahead and making a video
> available to at least two people that you trust from the pes_mxlo list.
>
> Please look from our point of view.
>
> Your statements given on your site, and your plans, make it sound like this
> thing will be a snap to build and to run.
>
> It is indeed easy to build, but it is anything but easy to run.
>
> Look at all the time that is being put into it by many people, and so far
> none have succeeded.
>
> Remember that your decision to not show the video last week on Tuesday was
> based in part on an incorrect perception that I was the one posting the polls
> and fostering the skepticism.
>
> I think you can see that we have done very well to keep the list on a
> professional level.
>
> Could you please respond, in kind, by helping those who are showing the most
> belief and diligence, by making the video available to them.
>
> No need for elaborate NDA's, just an emailed statement (or possibly faxed and
> signed) from them saying that they will not disseminate the video without
> your express permission.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sterling

See also

  • An Open Letter to MXLO to Come Clean - Contrary to MXLO website presentation, their plans are not adequate, and the device specified is not easy to get to work. Request for rewording of website and plans to reflect this. Request for making good on word to assist in building a working unit.
 
Google


Web PureEnergySystems

Disclaimer: MXLO is an independent company that has given us permission to post their plans here.  This arrangement should not be construed as an endorsement by them of everything that appears here.

www.PureEnergySystems.com
Copyright © 2003, 2004