|
|
Assembly TipsIn keeping with the design as presented by MXLO See also: Communications from MXLO - 8-page compilation by Brian Prothro (RetroRocket59) from personal phone calls from MXLO and all email messages posted to the pes_mxlo Yahoo user group to date. Page Contents:
Like Threading a Needle from Across the Room
From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Zinc Answer is here
"Your unit will work as is, if you have the patience to find the zero point. This is the same thing that is needed for any other magnetic motor. Even the ones that were built to half scale could work because the layout is correct to create the effect but the zero point must be found. Think of it as threading a needle from across a room, it is a difficult task but it can be done." Follow the Plans to the Letter
I would really urge you all to stick to the plans
as they are.
There is something we are missing, and it isn't
something obvious.
Don't be so quick to give up on the design as it
is given.
Do everything as the plans prescribe, from the
type of glue, to the type of plastic, to the type of magnet and bearing, etc.
To the letter.
There is something about how
to place the stator in position that is the key, from what I can gather.
Sterling
Tips from Retrorocket59 - Thomas (MXLO) Phone Conversation
From: "retrorocket59" <retrorocket59@yahoo.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 8:35 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Got their call
Tech Tips from Thomas:
Construction tips:
Last - Thomas said it was a very delicate "centering" of alignment,
you had to keep trying with very delicate nudging. More tips from MXLO compiled by RetroRocket59http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pes_mxlo/message/451 From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com> In the interest of getting us all on the same page, I have gone back Ground of Aluminum Strip Self-Contained Stator Template -- Arrows Up
From: "TeroRanta" <tero.ranta@bigfoot.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: Built a new Unit
****** ...Also there are arrows that point to the holes on the ends of the template. When the template is cut there remains small points on the left of the template from the arrows. These should be facing up with magnets on outside of stator body. ****** See also: Arrows up (top side) on Stator No Metal in Rotor; Take Your Time
From: <webmaster@mxlo.com>
To: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: Q. Rotor Direction
The rotor will spin in whichever direction is catches torque. Please point out to your colleagues that they must not use a metal shaft on rotor, nor have any extending materials above rotor top surface, other then magnets and attaching screw. I am very impressed at the rate these experimenters are building the unit and the quality of their craftsmanship. I am getting the impression though, that they believe they will just surround
the rotor and it will spin. Well yes it will, once they have learned to handle
it in the zero point field. Please tell them to take their time, and they will
succeed. * * * * *
From: "retrorocket59" <retrorocket59@yahoo.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 7:05 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] More notes
Thomas said the rotor may go 'either' direction when starting. I would suggest you NOT make anything in the rotor area metalic, (shaft, bearing up high) this will draw a magnetic field towards it and distort whatever complex shape of field this unit may be utilizing. Also, if you will note the 'spiral' magnetic arrangement... Kudos on the Lenz law and aluminum explanation, and that a magnet points to the pole it is indicating. ---RetroRocket59--- Timing Procedure
From: <webmaster@mxlo.com>
To: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:23 PM
Hi Sterling, [...] As for the building time, when we say 45 minutes to build the device we are referring to having the parts at hand. This time does not relate to the action that is required to run the device, which has been explained as an, up, down, left, right motion. Not everyone will get the unit running as it takes patience. We have developed a procedure where we have our base marked in units, and we work in individual areas to adjust the device. This is done to prevent trying the same area over and again. Some areas are ideal for speed while others will turn very slowly or not at all. When we were introduced to the device we were not aware of how delicate adjustment was because the device was always running. We have since likened it to the Lester Hendershot device, as he experienced similar difficulty in running his generator coil. It takes patience.
[...] Those who patiently experiment will learn the principle, because
that will be their focus and concern.
Sincerely, Thomas Jean * * * * *
From: "TeroRanta" <tero.ranta@bigfoot.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:42 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: Tero's MXLO
built, not running yet
Received these adjustment tips from MXLO today (13th Mar 2004): ***** You must gently glide the stator body to the left, right, forward, back. This will help you find the zero point. It may take some time for the exact area to be found but once you have found an area that allows any full rotations mark it on the base and continue working in that area. You might also try moving stator up and down slightly. ***** * * * * *
From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Zinc Answer is here
---RetroRocket59--- "[...] Your unit Not Same Position Starting as Running
From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] More from MXLO
"It appears to be exact center when spinning but off center (slightly) when started." ---RetroRocket59--- Zinc-Plated Neos Not RequiredMessage 1 of 2
From: "easyfly51" <wayne.jones@sait.ab.ca>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 8:33 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] RE: Zinc Magnetic
Rings
Looks like we all used nickel neo's and maybe this is the reason it won't spin. It is on the plans and we overlooked this. I still don't know how the magnetic flux is different zinc vs nickel neo's. Maybe someone knows more. Another thought is to zinc plate what we have and save a little money. Or try cheap ceramic rings for a spin test. Any thoughts. This is what I got back and if ceramic would work! Later Wayne MXLO: Zinc coated magnets are what we have always used and also what the plans call for. There are many websites that sell Zinc coated on the internet. Our provider is in Japan but we are unable to get any magnet supplies at this time. We cannot say for certain because other have tested using ceramic for entire unit and have claimed success. * * * * * Message 2 of 2
From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Zinc Answer is here
---RetroRocket59--- "You do not need to invest in Zinc, nor does anyone else. Your unit will work as is, if you have the patience to find the zero point. This is the same thing that is needed for any other magnetic motor. Even the ones that were built to half scale could work because the layout is correct to create the effect but the zero point must be found. Think of it as threading a needle from across a room, it is a difficult task but it can be done." Use fine thread to find Triangle center
From: "easyfly51" <wayne.jones@sait.ab.ca>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] RE: My Motor Pics
If you look I used fine thread to find Triangle center. Used this as a reference point and worked around. Wayne Coming into Focus
From: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
To: "Pure Energy Systems Admin
egroup" <pes_admin@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:30 AM
Subject: coming into focus
You know those "magic eye" books and posters? They look like gobbledygook upon first viewing. But as you learn to focus your eyes beyond the picture, the picture itself comes into focus in three dimensions. The trick is to not then let your eyes jump into focus, because that then brings the picture out of focus again. It is a new focus phenomenon, and it is hard to do at first. It is not natural. Once you do this a while, you can get pretty good at it. I'm guessing that timing this motor will be the same kind of phenomenon. Sterling Imbalance May be the Objective
From: Sterling
D. Allan
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:59 PM
Subject: CLUE? look at the MXLO rotor photo: slightly askew
Here's something to consider.
It may be that a perfectly constructed device is
actually not what is desirable here. I would predict that the perfectly
constructed device will result in net zero lines of force.
It may be the flaw in the placement of the magnets
that puts the device into imbalance and rotation.
Take a look at the rotor image provided in the
MXLO assembly plans.
"Magnet placement shown in picture is correct placement."
Notice that from the vantage of the photo, the
right-hand set of magnets is not exactly symmetrical with the left-hand set of
magnets. [They appear askew.]
This could be a function of the photo being shot
off-center, then copped, so the rotor is centered, which could invalidate my
theory.
However, this does correspond with what Thomas
told me regarding the novice having a better chance at success than the pro.
It may be that the variations between plans, and
the lack of super accurate specs is a huge clue in itself. Super
accuracy may not be the objective.
Something to think about.
Sterling
* * * * * Follow-up:
* * * * *
From: Shukra
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: [pes_mxlo] Re: CLUE? look at the MXLO
rotor photo: slightly askew
If imbalance is the key to success, (noting what Thomas
has said, it seems to be so.), then such imbalance can be created not only
by the positioning of the magnets, but also by placing the rotor and
the stator asymmetrically. The problem is, while there are trillions of such
asymmetrical (or imbalance) positions for a unit, only one of such
positions could be effective. The point is, we may have to give less
importance to build a perfect unit (physical dimensions), rather have a
fairly accurate unit, (let it not necessarily be perfect) and
spend all our time and energy to find its own unique positioning suitable to
its own unique measurements. For me, this seems to be the reason why Thomas
is so "CASUAL" about dimensions, measurements, type of magnet,
etc. What I am trying to say is, have a unit and try to find its unique
positioning to operate. Then, we all may end up with a unique unit
individually.
-Chandra
Ring Magnets Preferable to Discs
From: "kenny_ppm" <kennethgerke@comcast.net>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 10:06 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] FYI Magnet type
Rotor Magnets non-ring; shaft non-conductive
From: "retrorocket59" <retrorocket59@yahoo.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 6:50 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Reply to several posts
metal? Thomas told me it should not be conductive. I posted before, Thomas at mxlo said he preferred to use non-ring, smaller ceramic buttons on the rotor. It 'sounded as if' they had not used neos on the rotor. ---RetroRocket59--- Magnet Gauss level not Crucial
From: "retrorocket59" <retrorocket59@yahoo.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 5:43 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: Inside Dia of Rings
yours. Thomas had said to me that there is flexibility with the magnets, but someone else mentioned that he said that neo's did tend to do better. ---RetroRocket59--- MXLO on copper wire and aluminum strip
Sterling here are a couple of more responses from
MXLO to post:
Their responses are in BOLD RED.
Ken
Hello, I purchased and received the plans online for the
motor today.
I just have a couple quick questions please, 1. The rectifier diode, where does it get soldered to? I didn't see it in the pictures do you have a detailed picture you can send in response with this email? Does the diode solder between the copper wire going out after it the copper wire has been wrapped around the magnets and the lead out? Could you PLEASE send a clear pic of where the diode is soldered in your wiring diagram? 2. The pic is not too clear about the copper wiring, does it wrap around
the magnets 2 times, close to middle of plexiglass plates? is that correct? The diode can be soldered to either lead out. Only 1 is needed. The copper
wire wraps around the outer stator body close to the center of the stator and
acts as a coil. After I bought my plans , I wondered what is the role of the aluminum strip? I understand a revolving magnet produces current in a copper wire, does that hold true for aluminum also? Without the aluminum on the base there is very little current generated for some reason. When replaced it returns, so the strip is required. The pics show neo ring magnets on the stator. The ring magnets are the ones that we have found to work the best because of the field it creates. It will work with disc magnets but at slower speeds. Solder of Bearing not Essential
From: "retrorocket59" <brian@ziponline.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: bad student joke
[...] ---RetroRocket59--- No Need for Electrical Connect for Aluminum to Bearing
From: "retrorocket59" <retrorocket59@yahoo.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 8:54 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: Aluminum size
from hardcopy
I would repeat that last week, Thomas of MXLO said that soldering the bearing
was only for stability. There is no need for an electrical Set Apparatus on Non-Mag. Table
From: Sterling
D. Allan
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] environmental perturbations?
Maybe be wooden box separating the unit from
anything metal or from any conducting wires by at least three feet (total
guess) would help reduce such possibilities of environmental
perturbations. And on the larger scale, perhaps the unit will work
in remote areas better than in electrically congested areas.
Sterling
North on compass points to South polarity
From: "elkiv54" <elkiv54@yahoo.no>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:06 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: Very Confused
To determine which end of a permanent magnet is its north pole and which is its south, take a compass and hold it a reasonable (see note below) distance from one end of the magnet. If the north end of the compass needle (often the red S end!) points toward this end of the magnet, you know that this end of the magnet is a south pole! That's because opposite poles attract and the "north" end of the compass needle, a north pole, is attracted to south poles. Interestingly enough, the magnetic pole near the earth's geographic north pole is actually a south magnetic pole. That's why the north pole of the compass needle points toward the earth's north geographic pole. NOTE: When you use a compass to detect which pole of the magnet is north, be
careful not to bring the compass needle too close to the permanent magnet. A
strong permanent magnet can remagnetize the compass needle and reverse its
poles. To make sure that this hasn't occurred, check to see whether the compass
still points toward the north pole after you bring it near strong permanent
magnets. References:Finding North on Your Magnet, Without a Compass
From: "youhavetoremember" <brian165@hotmail.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:28 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Re: I love this group!
The North pole of the Earth IS a SOUTH POLE magnet. Here is a simpler test, take a piece of foam and put a magnet on it and place this in a sink or tub with water in it, have the N and S fields of the magnet parallel to the water. N--S <-magnet |||||| <-foam /\/\/\/\ <-water The foam with magnet on it will then rotate in the water and the NORTH pole of the magnet will point to the Earth's North Pole, aka UP on a map ;) Wire Gauge Conversion Chart
From: "chorianopoulos2002" <Chris.Horianopoulos@bofasecurities.com>
To: <pes_mxlo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 3:04 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] gauge measurements
http://www.reade.com/Conversion/wire_gauge.html See also
Page posted by SDA
March 4, 2004 |
|
|
www.PureEnergySystems.com |