Ken Hegemann's MXLO Magnetic Motor replicationMXLO Magnet Motor Open Sourcing Project

Summary: This open sourcing project sponsored by Pure Energy Systems, based on a design by MXLO, commenced Mar. 3, 2004 and was active for about a month.  At least 14 (8 verified) replications were built, none of which worked, proving that MXLO plans are neither easy nor complete, contrary to what they insinuate on their site, which now redirects to the U.S. government's renewable energy site. On July 10, a hint about shielding was given that was not contained in the plans.

(PES Home)

- Project Home -
- GreaterThings -

Translate Page

Latest

Forum

Replications
Working (not verified)
- Neweid(?)
Built; not working
- tip_alias
- Joe Friday
- Ken Hegemann
- Chris H.
- Dann McCreary
- Tero Ranta
- Retrorocket59
- Wayne Jones
- Ed Anderson
- more

Data
- Performance Data
- Non-working
- Flux Field Data
- Electrical Output
- Optimization

Supplemental
- Sourcing
- Ramifications

Theory (How)
- Spiral
- Aluminum
- ZPE

Legal
- MXLO Permission
- MXLO & NDA
- Patents

Images
 o Simulation
 o Photos
 o AutoCAD
 o Video (pending)

FAQ
Related Sites
Contact


http://tinyurl.com/2enzp
You are here:
Pure Energy Systems > Open Sourcing > Magnetic Motors > MXLO > Replications > Dann McCreary

Dann McCreary's Replication of the MXLO Magnetic Motor

Half-scale variant of MXLO design.


top view 1/2-size build attempt by Dann
More Photos



click here for Dann's flux photos

posted in reverse chronological sequence

Fiddling Around: Pulsing the Rotor

From: "creatr" <creator@flyinghouse.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 1:37 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Comments and fiddling around....
 
Greetings Friends,

A few comments about recent postings:

I find the pictures and reports very helpful and even encouraging;
thanks to all for sharing! Thanks for passing along answers from
MXLO central.

The "galaxy" pictures, although not MXLO, I found very interesting. 
Tero's implementation is also very nicely done, but I think, Tero,
that you may have to cut the screws short inside your stator -- see
comments below.

This afternoon I spent a fair amount of time fooling around with my
1/2 scale implementation, just trying to develop a better "feel" for
the fields and for possible variations on stator placement. What
follows includes a good deal of speculation, so some of you may wish
to "tune out" here.... :)

One experiment that I did was to "drive" the rotor from above with a
hand-held magnet -- although I've never done it, I think that it may
have been kind of like stroking a Minato wheel.  I could make it
spin quite vigorously by moving the handheld magnet in various
patterns.  Of course, I was imparting the energy to make it move;
but I was also getting a bit more of a "feel" for the motion and
field interactions.

Another thing I tried was to stick extra magnets on my rotor.  I put
some ceramic magnets on, both above and below the rotor.  I wanted
some below the rotor so that they would get better "engagement" with
the aluminum strip.

By the way, it is quite fascinating to place a long aluminum strip
at a very steep angle (50-80 degrees) and let a neo magnet slide
along it downward.  You can keep it from slipping off the edge by
tilting the strip left or right as it slides down.  Experiencing
that will give you a real sense of just how "real" the interaction
of the rotor and the aluminum must be.

One interesting (and I suspect important) aspect of the ceramic
magnets on the rotor is that they mass more than Neos for an
equivalent amount of magnetic force.  Someone here has mentioned the
possible importance of mass in the rotor for a "flywheel" effect.

While I realize that all reports from MXLO indicate that the rotor
should start and move on its own, I have still found it useful to
move the rotor through its circuit with my finger in order to feel
the forces involved.  With the added ceramic magnets on my rotor, I
could feel a smoother rotation.  I could also feel more of the
interaction between the magnets, the aluminum, and either locking up
or gliding past the "sticky spots", depending on the various ways
that I positioned the stator.  All in all, today I got more of a
sense that this device might really function if I get all these
things playing together correctly.

Trying to feel and visualize its operation, I have a sense that
there could be an interesting dynamic interchange of angular
momentum from a suitably heavy spinning rotor, EMF kickback from the
aluminum plate, and a rippling perturbation of the spiraling
torroidal stator field.  I can almost picture the two rotor
vanes "surfing" along a wave created by the wake of the rotor field
as it intersects the aluminum and induces a fluctuation into the
torroid.

[...]

Well, I know this has been rather long-winded and very speculative;
but if you've read this far, perhaps you've caught a bit of the
sense of what I've experienced playing with this thing today.

Best regards,

-Dann

Tried following 'Timing' Instructions

From: "creator" <creator@flyinghouse.com>
To: "'Sterling D. Allan'" <sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: Role of PES and role of MXLO

Hi Sterling,

[...]

> MXLO wishes to focus on a faithful replication of their plans,
> giving first priority to their paying customers.

Clearly understood. I realize that I'm not (yet :) a paying
customer and don't expect Thomas to treat me as such.  Furthermore,
I also realize (and have tried to be very clear in my group
postings) that I'm not really replicating, but just experimenting
right at the moment; and not understanding the theory behind
any of this, I'm sort of whistling into the wind... :)

> That said, I do not wish to discourage the posting now of reports
> of modified replication attempts.  Just be sure to note clearly
> that what you are posting is a modification.

I certainly hope to continue experimenting (as time permits)
and posting, and intend to make my postings as clear as possible;
I even expect to buy parts for a faithful replication myself,
especially if I see or hear that one is running.

I have appreciated your postings from Thomas of comments on
timing and tuning
, but must confess to being somewhat mystified
by some of his descriptions.  Based on his comments, I've done
some more "playing" with my unit, sitting there and moving my
stator up, down, left, right, rotating it relative to the base,
just trying to "feel" what's happening.  I've even seen the
rotor turn once or twice completely around, but not yet in
a way to persuade me that I've hit the "zero point" (not
being entirely sure as to what Thomas means by that.  Also,
his description of marking the base and not repeating areas
is mysterious...

Best regards,

-Dann

Magnets Were Backwards; Still no Rotation

From: "creatr" <creator@flyinghouse.com>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 12:55 AM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Half-Size Build Modifications

Hi Folks,

I've uploaded some new pictures to my half-size build
attempt folder. 

 


Full Assembly (enlargement)


Rotor Assembly (enlargement)

I've tried several modifications:

1) Bearing no longer in rotor, now in base below stator
2) Brass shaft replaced with wooden dowel
3) Smaller (tiny) neos in rotor to reduce cogging

Still no joy... but here are a few observations:

With the bearing at the bottom, it is much harder to
keep the rotor level and wobble-free (read "impossible").

I discovered that all my magnet polarities were reversed.
At first I thought I could just turn stators inside out, but
I had to actually re-do them all (not a big deal - remove
the holding tape on the outside, remove and re-insert
correctly, and re-tape).  However, no change in behavior
that I can see.

[also in message: Free ems Software for CAD files]

Thanks for your other comments and suggestions[...]

Regards,

-Dann


Photos & Observations from 1/2-size Build Attempt; Flux Lines Photos

From: "creatr" <creator@flyinghouse.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 9:02 PM
Subject: [pes_mxlo] Builder Report

Greetings Friends,

I've uploaded some photos of my first 1/2 size build attempt.

You can see them in the "Files" section, "creator" folder and "Half-Size Build Attempt" subfolder.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pes_mxlo/files/creator/Half-Size%20Build%20Attempt/

[click for enlarged view]


Assembled


rotor


rotor mount


Top View

Before you ask, No Joy yet... :) :( :)

However, spending the day building has been a great learning experience, and I'll mention some observations.

Also, this build has MANY variations from the original plans, including:

1) One-Half Scale
2) Disk Neo magnets (instead of ring)
3) Neos on the rotor
4) Brass rotor mount
5) Bearing embedded in rotor
6) "non-standard" aluminum strip(s)
7) Neos inserted into holes drilled in stator and rotor
8) Thinner acrylic
9) Probably others I can't recall right now! :)

I busted my first stator while drilling it out :( so just a comment, if you drill, when in doubt, FEED BIT SLOWER... :)

Some observations:

My stator walls are slightly bowed inward... not sure of the cause yet, whether flux imbalance or stress from drilling.

While friction seemed to be mostly holding the magnets in place (2 - 1/4" x 1/16" magnets per hole) I taped them in with clear package sealing tape to avoid AWOL magnets.

Rotor cogs pretty strongly.

I tried aluminum foil strip first, then added a chunk of thicker aluminum -- no obvious effect.

Where to from here?

I think playing with aluminum (thickness, shape, etc.) may produce some fruit...

I can fiddle the rotor height easily.

I may make another rotor(s) w/ ceramic magnets.

I can go to a non-metalic rotor mount.

I can move bearing to bottom (like original design); my thought was that it spins nice where it is, and though magnetic it is very symmetrical; but who knows? :)

Well, that's it for now... hope you enjoy the photos (I have lot's more, but will reserve for questions and if ultimately worthwhile (i.e. if I get it running!)).

I will also upload some FLUX PHOTOS in a separate folder for Robert Calloway and all you other "theoreticians" out there...

[click here for flux photos]


Also after playing/meditating some more, I'm sure I'll have more observations later... :)

Best regards,

-Dann


About Dann

See also

Contact

Dan McCreary  <creator@flyinghouse.com>

 

Page posted by SDA March 4, 2004
Last updated March 14, 2004 04:33:03 PM MST

Google


Web PureEnergySystems

Disclaimer: MXLO is an independent company that has given us permission to post their plans here.  This arrangement should not be construed as an endorsement by them of everything that appears here.

www.PureEnergySystems.com
Copyright © 2003, 2004