Richard Timko's Design

Telesis Magnetic Repeller Motor Open Sourcing Project

Private/Password Required - until non-encumbrace, non-revocation contract is signed.
Status: Project commenced by Richard Timko, June 19, 2004.  No working prototype yet, pending proper materials.  Though Richard is giving this technology to the world, he requests that if anyone profits from its manufacture that they include him.

(PES Home)
Pure Energy Systems logo
- Project Home -
-PESWiki Version-

Translate Page

"telesis"

Latest

Forum

Photos

Instructions
- Intro
- Description
- Bill of Materials
- Assembling
- Templates
- Tips
- Improvements
- Variations
- Cautions
- Issues
- Credits

Replications

Data
- Calculations
- Performance Data
- Non-working
- Electrical Output
- Optimization

Supplemental
- Sourcing
- Endorsements
- Skeptics
- Ramifications
- Follow-up

Theory (How)

Legal
- Permission
- No Patent

Images
 o Simulation
 o Photos
 o AutoCAD
 o Video (pending)

FAQ
Related Sites
Contact


http://pureenergysystems.com/os/Telesis/skeptics/rauen040624/
You are here:
PureEnergySystems.com > Open Sourcing > Telesis > Skeptics > Liquid Nitrogen Maintenance Will Gobble Power

Liquid Nitrogen Maintenance Will Gobble Power

 

From: ken rauen
To: Sterling D. Allan
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: ... Telesis Site ...


Hi Sterling and Friends,

I examined the website material. The hardware that is ready for completion looks nice, like the inventor knows what he is doing, but that is just an impression and not necessarily the reality.

The description of the device, conceptually and mechanically, is sorely lacking in substance. His numbers do not look good, even if the device works, which is not even established firmly in concept. It is all too nebulous to me.

One inch-pound of work is 0.011 Joules. A 4x value per revolution is 0.044 J. At 1000 rpm, the maximum operation expected (and I agree), this is merely 0.73 Watts.

The superconducting shields (not fully explained) need to be immersed in liquid nitrogen or surrounded with that cold of an environment. This size device inside a dewar flask chilled with liquid nitrogen will consume at least 5 Watts of heat to boil the LN2 to keep it refrigerated to that temperature; I speak from direct experience dealing with LN2 and dewars at NERL. The power consumed to generate the LN2 is even greater than that, so even if the device works (a can of worms to prove, with the LN2 input), its output is less than what it takes to keep it cold! I do not see a winner here.

Ken
[Science Advisor, PES]

* * * *

From: Sterling D. Allan
To: Telesis egroup
Cc: Ken Rauen
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: Liquid Nitrogen Maintenance Will Gobble Power


Richard,

Don't be discouraged. I'm wondering if Mark Goldes' ultra conductors (room temperature superconductors) might have an application here. Once we open source, I can approach him.

Sterling


Richard's Reply

From: Richard
To: sterlingda@greaterthings.c*
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:54 PM
Subject: Liquid NItrogen power Gobble fix.


Sterling,
This guy name Ken has forgotten one thing.
Remember:
When the superconductor is placed in the fiber carbon cylinder, which will be designed to work between 0 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit, the liquid nitrogen will not boil just sitting in a room temperature building or room.
But when it starts spinning the shaking of the gates opening and closing will generate heat but that is all of the heat it will generate,
and it will take a lot of rpm's to raise that carbon fiber cylinder temperature.
Ken's exact numbers on power output could be low, if this is producing a net gain of 1 to 1.5 inch lbs. per revolution at 1000 rpm 's
it will produce between 16,000 and 24,000 inch ounces per minute.
SAY 24,000 divided by 16 and then divide it by 850 then you have approx. Horsepower might be about 1.7647.
I am not sure but I think those are pretty close numbers. I may have to divide these numbers per second to come up with a #
that is actual Horsepower.

Thanks, Richard

* * * *

From: ken rauen 
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [pes_...] Fw: Liquid NItrogen power Gobble fix.



Is that type of superconductor operating as a superconductor in the stated range of 0 to 120 deg F? This is news to me.

The stated ballpark number of 5 watts of refrigeration with LN2 is for the whole device, not just the tubes. How can you cool the tubes without cooling the whole device?

The engineering units conversion is as follows:
(1 in #) = (1 in #)(m / 39.4 in)(N / 2.21 #) = 0.11 Nm = 0.011 Joules. Multiplied by 4 pulses per revolution = 0.044 J. 1000 rpm = 167 revolutions per second. (0.044 J)(167 rps) = 0.73 J/s = 0.73 watts.

Ken Rauen
Science Advisor

* * * *

From: Richard
To: sterlingda@greaterthings.c*
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 9:15 PM


Sterling,

[...na...] To cool this device because of LN2 problem the following are alternatives:
1.Deep cool underground (man-made or cave)
2.High altitude aircraft
3.Arctic or Antarctic use
4.Use in space beyond Earth's atmosphere
5.Northern or Winter Climates

Thanks,
Richard Timko


See also

 

Page posted by SDA June 24, 2004
Last updated June 26, 2004

Google


Web PureEnergySystems

www.PureEnergySystems.com
Copyright © 2004